Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01345
Original file (PD2012 01345.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XX         BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY
CASE NUMBER: PD
1201345   SEPARATION DATE: 20020606
BOARD DATE: 20130416


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty, HM3/E-4, (8408/Hospital Corpsman), medically separated for testalgia, right greater than left. The CI developed right sided testicular torsion in 1999 and underwent a bilateral orchiopexy. Due to continued pain, he underwent surgical exploration where his cremasteric muscle was stripped from the cord on the right and a small hydrocele was removed. He continued with post operative pain, right greater than the left. He failed both surgical and conservative treatment and was unable to meet the physical requirements of his rating or satisfy physical fitness standards and was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the right greater than left persistent testalgia condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I had severe depression, anxiety that was severe was bipolar wich at that time was undiagnoses. Dr’s never went to any depth on my mental problems violent outburst was told I didn’t have an choice to dibate on the %. My total health was disregarded after my fisrt surgery I was given little pain meds and not treated for any other issues at that time wich were servere depression anxiety PTSD [posttraumatic stress disorder] all of wich trigerd violent oburst throwing stuff and breaking equipment wasn’t given treatment for my severe pain just told to deal with it and not allowed to properly heal told I was a melingarer.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The other requested conditions (depression/anxiety/bipolar and PTSD) are not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020426
VA (14 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020607
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
R>L testalgia 8730 10% B Testalgia s/p orchiopexy 7599-7525 10% 20030812
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Other X 2 / Not Service-Connected x 4 20030812
Rating: 10%
Combined: 40%




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral Testalgia, Right Greater Than Left. In 1999, the CI presented with an acute onset of right testicular pain and swelling. He was diagnosed with right testicular torsion and underwent bilateral orchiopexy. He continued to report post-surgical testicular pain bilaterally with prolonged standing, walking, and running. A second surgical procedure (right hydrocelectomy and spermatic cord stripping) was performed in 2001 for persistent right greater than left testicular swelling and pain. The narrative summary (NARSUM), 4 months prior to separation notes persistent right greater than left testicular pain. The NARSUM examination was significant for right testicle and epididymis tenderness to palpation and no left testicular findings. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination 10 months after separation, the CI reported daily, right greater than left, testicular pain with swelling; worse with activity and sitting. The CI reported no use of pain medications for the testicular pain. The examiner noted bilateral moderate testicular and cord tenderness to palpation with cord thickening.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the bilateral testalgia condition as unfitting and rated it analogous to neuralgia of the ilio-inguinal nerve, VASRD code 8730. The VASRD defines neuralgia as dull, intermittent pain along a typical nerve distribution. Although the VA conferred a similar disability rating of 10%, the coding pathway, 7599-7525, was analogous to chronic epididymo-orchitis. The Board considered both coding options as reflective of the functional impact of activity dependent bilateral testalgia not responsive to surgical and conservative management; however, Board members agreed that the PEB’s neuralgia coding more accurately characterized the testalgia condition. IAW VASRD §4.124, the maximum rating for neuralgia is equal to moderate incomplete paralysis of the involved nerve, thus there is no route a higher rating under VASRD code 8730. The Board then considered whether a higher of rating could be conferred using the VA’s 7299-7525 coding option, but there was no evidence of “continuous intensive therapy” for a higher rating of 30%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bilateral testalgia condition. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the bilateral testalgia condition and IAW VASRD §4.124a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.




RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
Bilateral Testalgia 8730 10%
RATING 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120610, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record




         XX
        
Director of Operations
         Physical Disability Board of Review



MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 31 May 13

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:

- X former USMC
- X former USN
- X former USMC
- X former USN
- X former USN
- X former USN



                                                     
                                                     Assistant General Counsel
                                                      (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02826

    Original file (PD-2013-02826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “right chronic testalgia”as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00560

    Original file (PD2009-00560.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and determined unfit for the Testalgia (coded 8730). The prognosis was good, and “with regard to disability rating I would say it would be mild with respect to the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.” The Navy PEB determined that the CI’s PTSD was not unfitting. These other conditions are all judged by the Board to be not unfitting at the time of separation from service, and are not relevant for disability rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00652

    Original file (PD2012-00652.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a permanent P3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB physical exam demonstrated a surgically absent right testicle and a normal left testicle. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX President Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557 SUBJECT: Department of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00720

    Original file (PD2012-00720.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the condition, but this did not bear on rating. The Board agreed the evidence supports likely a neuropathic etiology, but also clinically could support the 7525 code and considered evaluating the evidence for a higher rating under this code. 2 PD1200720 RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01658

    Original file (PD2012 01658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left testalgia associated and varicocele, status post (s/p)varicocele ligation was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB)adjudicated left testalgia associated as unfitting rated 10% withapplication of theVeteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining condition, varicocele, s/p varicocele ligation was adjudicated to by a Category II condition, a condition that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01859

    Original file (PD2012 01859.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He reported having 4-5 headaches that month, but he was not in pain on that day. After due deliberation and considering all of the evidence, the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the migraine headache condition. Right Foot Pain Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01678

    Original file (PD-2014-01678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left testicular condition was characterized as “severe left testalgia,” and “persistent varicocele,”was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20020128VA *ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Severe Left Testalgia7599-873010%Chronic Testalgia (Specifying Surgical Residuals and Neuritis)7599-752510%*Persistent Varicocele“Related to [Above]”Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 11 (Not in Scope)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01884

    Original file (PD-2013-01884.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the 14 September 2004 post-operative urology follow-up, the CI complained of constant 6-7/10 right groin and testicle pain. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two ratings), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right testicular pain condition (coded 7525). Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00965

    Original file (PD2012 00965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) forwarded chronic left testicular pain status post (s/p) left varicocele and left cord stripping procedure; left knee pain; and history of toxoplasmosis of the eyes to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The PEBadjudicatedchronic left testicular pain as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. Other x 620050124 Combined:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00348

    Original file (PD-2012-00348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB adjudicated the testicular and right ankle pain conditions as unfitting, rated 0% and 0% respectively, and was then medically separated with a 0% combined disability rating. The PEB assigned a 0% rating coded analogous to 8730 (neuralgia ilioinguinal nerve) for moderate pain and while the original VA rating decision assigned a 0% rating, a rating decision 8 months post separation increased the rating to 10% for severe pain after a request was made to reopen the case. I have...